Frazier v. Ray
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BRATTON, J.
The appellee instituted this suit to recover the sum of $1,131, being the balance due upon a commission of $2,631 earned by him upon the sale of certain cattle belonging to the appellant. He charged that the parties had agreed upon a commission of $1 per head for all cattle sold; that through his instrumentality the appellee sold to C. L. Anceney, of Boseman, Mont., 2,631 head of cattle; that the appellee had paid him $1,500 to apply upon such commission, leaving still due the sum sued for.
Tbe appellant denied that any agreement for the payment of $1 per head…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Snow v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Pollman & Bros. Coal & Sprinkling Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Clark Leasing Corp. v. White Sands Forest Products, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.