Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Ray

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1923No. 2738PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BRATTON, J.

The appellee instituted this suit to recover the sum of $1,131, being the balance due upon a commission of $2,631 earned by him upon the sale of certain cattle belonging to the appellant. He charged that the parties had agreed upon a commission of $1 per head for all cattle sold; that through his instrumentality the appellee sold to C. L. Anceney, of Boseman, Mont., 2,631 head of cattle; that the appellee had paid him $1,500 to apply upon such commission, leaving still due the sum sued for.

Tbe appellant denied that any agreement for the payment of $1 per head…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Snow v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Pollman & Bros. Coal & Sprinkling Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Clark Leasing Corp. v. White Sands Forest Products, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API