Higgins v. Lufi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal brings into question the propriety of a trial court’s sanction under Rule 37.02(2)(b), Minn.R.Civ.P., excluding expert testimony because of a direct and willful failure on the part of appellants’ trial attorney and the expert witness himself to obey the court’s order that the expert be deposed. Appellants contend further that the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance of the trial and an additional adverse medical examination was an abuse of discretion constituting prejudicial error, that the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony as to a crucial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Krech v. ErdmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Beckman v. v. J. M. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Welfare of R.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990