Legal Opinion

Smith v. Soo Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 2000No. C7-00-338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellant railroad worker, allegedly injured while carrying a five-gallon water bottle up the stairs of his work building, sought relief under 45 U.S.C. § 51 (1994), the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA). The district court granted respondent railroad summary judgment based on lack of actual or constructive notice that employees were carrying bottles. Because appellant has shown that his employer and agent saw bottles stored on a building’s first floor and knew they were used by third-floor employees who had no elevator to transport them, appellant has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Clarence J. Williams v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API