Legal Opinion

Heikes v. Heikes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1926No. Appeal 32PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop,

The parties to this action, were married October 5, 1918, at Easton, Md., where the respondent lived. The complainant’s home was nearby. Soon after the marriage, they took up their residence on a farm owned by the complainant’s father about eight miles from Easton. The complainant owned some personal property on the farm, consisting of chickens, ducks, turkeys, cows, horses and an automobile. A separation took place the latter part of April when, as alleged in the libel, the respondent wilfully and maliciously deserted the complainant. The material evidence presented was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Pomerantz v. PomerantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Hill v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. D'Andrea v. D'AndreaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Alexander v. AlexanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Irwin v. IrwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API