Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Irwin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1938No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

In this divorce action the court below entered a final decree in favor of the libellant on the ground that the respondent had wilfully and maliciously deserted her husband. That court did not file an opinion but adopted the recommendation of a master, made after findings of fact and a discussion of the facts and law. We have reached a different conclusion and are all of the opinion that the libellant failed to sustain the/ burden that was on him to make out a case by evidence that was clear and satisfactory.

As we are required to do, in the absence of a jury trial (Sloan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  2. Langeland v. LangelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Winner v. WinnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crater EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Starr v. StarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Tatem v. TatemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Bench v. BenchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API