Legal Opinion
O'BRIEN v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 22, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-6850PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This civil action has been brought before the Court upon the defendants’ motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for the entry of a default judgment against the plaintiff, Frank O’Brien, IV. In accordance with the rationale set forth in the paragraphs which follow, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The relevant facts underlying this ease, as presented in the parties pleadings, may be succinctly summarized. In March, 1990, the plaintiff, who was then and still is employed as a police officer for the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. Haverford CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Sterling v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hicks v. ArthurDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Peterkin v. Columbus County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Johnson v. Resources for Human DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.