Hicks v. Arthur
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants. Defendants make two main objections to the Interrogatories; first, that statistical evidence is irrelevant to plaintiffs’ claims and second, that they do not have the race information sought by plaintiffs and could not gather it without excessive burden.
This case alleges race and sex discrimination by Resources for Human Development, Inc. (RHD), an employer, and by Robert Arthur, Marsha O’Hara and Robert Fish-man, three employees of RHD. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Robbins v. Camden City Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Wilmore v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fassett v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Owens v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Raddatz v. Standard Register Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Westfield Insurance Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular HomesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.