Legal Opinion
VLT Corp. v. Unitrode Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 31, 2000No. CIV.A. 98-11152-PBSPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING UNI-TRODE TO RETURN INADVERTENTLY PRODUCED PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS (Docket No. 15)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court in this patent infringement action is a motion by VLT Corporation (“VLT”) and Vicor Corporation (“Vi-cor”) (together “Plaintiffs”) requesting that Defendant Unitrode Corporation (“Uni-trode”) be required to destroy or return copies of two documents which, they claim, were inadvertently produced. Plaintiffs’ motion was originally referred to Magistrate Judge Zachary R.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In re Rivastigmine Patent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.