Legal Opinion
Mortensen v. Pyramid Savings & Loan Ass'n of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1971No. 223PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The only issue presented is whether the commissioner of savings and loan is a “person aggrieved” and “directly affected” under sec. 227.16 (1), Stats., so as to have standing to maintain a petition to challenge the reversal of his decision by the savings and loan review board. The trial court held, and we think correctly so, that the commissioner of savings and loan is not a person aggrieved and is not directly affected within the meaning of sec. 227.16 (1).
The basic reason for this interpretation of the statute is that the commissioner of savings and loan is a part of the decisional process…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Town of Norway v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Trojan v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Kostman v. Pine Lawn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.