Legal Opinion

Town of Norway v. State Board of Health

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1966PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Norway contends the board and committee acted in excess of their statutory authority and jurisdiction in approving the plan in the proceeding under sec. 144.04, Stats. 1963, 1 because it failed to make a determination of the structural soundness of the proposed stabilization ponds. Norway also contends the agencies exceeded their authority under the Administrative Procedure Act, cli. 227, in failing to make a finding on a disputed issue of fact. We agree with the first contention but not with the second.

The approvals of April 9th and 13th were made in a proceeding under sec. 144.04, Stats.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of JuneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Park Building Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Town of Ashwaubenon v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Nick v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kegonsa Joint Sanitary District v. City of StoughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API