Legal Opinion

Arata & Peters, Inc. v. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1928No. Docket No. 6397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for foodstuffs furnished the contractor under a private contract. A demurrer to the third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and a judgment of dismissal as to the Water Company followed. Plaintiff appeals upon a typewritten record.

The amended complaint alleges that the plaintiff furnished to the contractor certain articles of food con sisting of fruit, vegetables, onions, beans, and potatoes, all of which “were actually used and consumed in the construction work” on a dam which the contractor was building for the Water Company…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Sherman v. Am. Sur. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bricker v. Rollins & JareckiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Earlsboro v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Linder Hardware Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Arata & Peters, Inc. v. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Arata & Peters, Inc. v. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Arata Peters v. Snow Mountain Water Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API