People v. Kolupa
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*787Defendant failed to preserve his argument that the People introduced insufficient evidence to corroborate the child victim’s testimony. At the close of the People’s case, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and defendant proceeded to present his own evidence. He did not thereafter renew the motion to dismiss at the close of his proof or specifically argue that there was not sufficient corroboration of the victim’s statements. As a result, this issue is not reviewable (see e.g. People v Lane,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. McgowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. SantiagoNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.