Legal Opinion
People v. Lane
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 2006PublishedCited by 382 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction. At the close of the People’s case, defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that the evidence did not establish a prima facie case of grand larceny in the fourth degree. The trial court promptly denied that motion. After defendant presented his own evidence, he did not renew his earlier argument. Consequently, whether the trial evidence was sufficient to support each element of the crime is not a question…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by382 opinions
- People v. KolupaNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. ZephyrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
377 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.