Legal Opinion

People v. Hines

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2001PublishedCited by 694 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*58OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

At issue is whether a trial court that denied a motion to dismiss at the close of the People’s case-in-chief may review that decision in the context of a post-verdict CPL 330.30 motion after defendant called witnesses and testified on his own behalf. Because we conclude that Supreme Court erred in revisiting its prior denial, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division reinstating defendant’s conviction.

Defendant Dashon Hines and co-defendant Jamie Crawford were charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.21…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. CabeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by694 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. SantiNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

689 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API