Legal Opinion

Ledingham v. Farmers Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1938No. 30370PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action by William Ledingham, plaintiff, to recover from the Farmers Irrigation District, defendant, $3,500 in damages to growing crops by its failure to deliver to him from the North Platte river, through its canal, the quantity of irrigating water to which he was entitled during July, August and September, 1934, under his appropriation and vested contract right.

In an answer to the petition defendant denied the allegations on which plaintiff’s claim for damages is based and pleaded failure of plaintiff to give in writing statutory notice essential to a recovery for such alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perdue v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Vonburg v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chapman v. General Petroleum Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Preston v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cover v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Cruz v. OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API