Legal Opinion

Chapman v. General Petroleum Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from the commission of an alleged tort. At the conclusion of plaintiffs ’ case the defendant moved for a nonsuit and a directed verdict. No evidence was offered by the defendant. The motions of the defendant were denied and the cause submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $1,500. Defendant appeals.

A statement of the facts, in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, is in order. On June 27, 1929, the plaintiffs purchased a gasoline service station in Med-ford, Oregon, subject to a lease and agency agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horn v. National Hospital AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ledingham v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Emerald Swimming Pools of Oregon, Inc. v. FruichantieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API