Chapman v. General Petroleum Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to recover damages resulting from the commission of an alleged tort. At the conclusion of plaintiffs ’ case the defendant moved for a nonsuit and a directed verdict. No evidence was offered by the defendant. The motions of the defendant were denied and the cause submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $1,500. Defendant appeals.
A statement of the facts, in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, is in order. On June 27, 1929, the plaintiffs purchased a gasoline service station in Med-ford, Oregon, subject to a lease and agency agreement…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horn v. National Hospital AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Ledingham v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Emerald Swimming Pools of Oregon, Inc. v. FruichantieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959