Legal Opinion

Vonburg v. Farmers Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1937No. 29916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action for injunction. Plaintiffs had decree. Defendants have appealed.

This is the second appearance of this cause in this court. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs refusing to further plead, a judgment .of dismissal was entered. Plaintiffs appealed, and the judgment of the district court was reversed. The opinion of this court appears at 128 Neb. 748, 260 N. W. 383. Thereafter defendants filed answers, and issues were joined, with the result above indicated.

It is the contention of plaintiffs that the law of the case was settled on the former…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fenton v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kearney Water & Electric Powers Co. v. Alfalfa Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Vonburg v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Application A-16642Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Enterprise Irrigation District v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. United States v. TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. In Re 2007 Admin. of AppropriationsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API