Legal Opinion
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 2009No. A08-1584, A08-1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
This appeal from summary judgment and denial of temporary injunctions arises from the commissioner of transportation’s award of a construction contract. Appellants Scott Sayer and Wendell Anthony Phillippi argue that the contract was awarded illegally because the winning contractor submitted a nonresponsive proposal. We reject appellants’ argument that the common-law definition of responsiveness applies to the design-build best-value method described in Minn.Stat. §§ 161.3410-.3428, and we conclude that under Minn.Stat. § 161.3426, subd. 1(a), the technical review…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- McKee v. LikinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sayer v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014