Legal Opinion
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1990No. C3-89-1042PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
This is an appeal in a garnishment action from an order and judgment of the district court following a court and jury trial and post trial motions. The trial court determined that the reasonableness of a Miller v. Shugart settlement was a nonjury issue and concluded the settlement was reasonable. Judgment was entered against Employers Reinsurance Corporation, as garnishee, in the sum of $355,145.27. Employers Reinsurance Corporation appeals.
FACTS
Alton M. Johnson Company (Johnson) had been a manufacturer of electrical equipment since 1944. Some time prior to November 1,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Osgood v. Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. WartmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Haarstad v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990