Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Alander
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 2003No. AC 22542PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
This case is before us on a writ of error brought by the plaintiffs in error, Douglas R. Daniels and Dennis Driscoll, both of whom are members of the bar of this state. The plaintiffs claim that the defendant in error,1 the Honorable Jon M. Alander, improperly *866reprimanded them for having violated subsections (a) (1) and (d) of rule 3.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct during a proceeding before him in the Superior Court. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that (1) the evidence did not support the trial court’s factual findings and that its legal conclusions were improper, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Martino v. Grace-New Haven Community HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Divito v. DivitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Daniels v. AlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. NATHAN J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.