Legal Opinion

King v. . Pope

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1932PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakicson, J.

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and at tbe close of all tbe evidence, tbe defendant in tbe court below made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. O. S., 567. Tbe court below overruled tbe motions and in tbis we can see no error.

All tbe evidence was to tbe effect tbat defendant bad violated certain provisions of the Motor Yebicle Uniform Act, N. C. Code, 1931, Anno. (Micbie), 2621(45), in reference to reckless driving; 2621(46) a and b, restrictions as to speed; 2621(51), driving on right side of highway, 2621(54), 2621(55).

Tbe court below read to tbe jury tbe sections above of tbe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Dickey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Ballew v. Asheville & East Tennessee RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API