Legal Opinion

In re Forrest

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 2, 1931No. 2678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal involves the consideration of claims for a process or method of pasteurizing dried fruits, particularly raisins. From a decision of the Board of Appeals, affirming that of the examiner rejecting the claims, appellant has appealed to this court. Claims 1 and 2 of the application are drawn to the pasteurizing step per se. Claims 3 and 4 add to the pasteurizing, the step of cooling after the pasteurization. Claims 2 and 3 are regarded as illustrative and follow:

2. The method of pasteurizing dried raisins which consists of subjecting said dried raisins for a period not in excess of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. In Re SlepianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. In Re FischerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API