In Re Slepian
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This proceeding involves five claims, Nos. 22 to 26, inclusive, contained in an application filed by Slepian January 5, 1921, for alleged new and useful improvements in thermionic amplifying devices. Seven claims of the application were allowed by the United States Patent Office. Those at issue were rejected by the Examiner, whose decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, and from the decision of the latter the appeal comes to this court.
The claims are divisible into two classes, Nos. 22 and 23 comprising one group, and Nos. 24,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & H. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- In Re SwanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re ForrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of BorcherdtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In Re BargeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Smith v. Kingsland, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Application of Nathaniel B. OrnitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.