Legal Opinion

Nellis v. Rickard

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1901No. S.F. No. 1790PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to quiet title. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying motion for new trial defendants appeal.

Defendant Mattie S. Rickard claims title under deed of trust from her father, Dr. Richard H. McDonald, to her, June 27,1891. She was at the time the wife of John C. Spencer, and had four children living, and they are still living. She had no other child. These children were born, respectively, on the following dates: November 28, 1879; October 10, 1881; October 15, 1883; March 15, 1885. She was divorced from Spencer, and married her co-defendant, Kenneth C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harrison v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Tiers v. . TiersNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Van Schuyver v. . MulfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Tyler v. MayreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Estate of WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Kandjounzeff v. GardinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API