Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Fuentes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.) dated September 24, 1991, which upon granting plaintiffs motion to reargue the prior order of the same court entered May 28, 1991, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Both the original summary judgment motion and defen*484dants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion to reargue were submitted upon attorney affidavits, with no affidavits from persons having actual knowledge of the events. Parties moving for summary judgment are obligated to prove through admissible evidence that they are entitled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolf v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Pastoriza v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Acosta v. FuentesNew York Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. In re New York State Silicone Breast Implant LitigationNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API