Legal Opinion

In re New York State Silicone Breast Implant Litigation

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*300OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan B. Lobis, J.

Plaintiffs have brought the present motion to vacate a prior order of this court which granted Dow Chemical’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. In that decision, this court noted that Judge Pointer had previously rejected all of plaintiffs’ theories for imposing liability on Dow Chemical and stated that it saw no reason to deviate from Judge Pointer’s decision. After this court issued its decision, Judge Pointer vacated and set aside his earlier order granting summary judgment in favor of Dow Chemical with respect to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Waters v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Acosta v. FuentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API