Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Fuentes
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Beverly S. Cohen, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, brought by defendants on the eve of trial seeking *1014dismissal of the complaint in a wrongful death action. The suit was brought by Ermelinda Acosta as administratrix of the estate of Luis Acosta, deceased, against Alfredo Fuentes and Raymond Fuentes, allegedly doing business as La Perla Cuchifrito and Fuentes Restaurant Inc.
The facts are as follows. On October 31, 1987, while eating a meal at a restaurant at 107 Clinton Street, New York, New York, plaintiff's decedent choked on some food and,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Taylor v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Wolf v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Parra v. Tarasco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Acosta v. FuentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994