Legal Opinion

Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of Education

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8325SC750PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in granting defendant Roberts’ motion for summary judgment in that different inferences could have been drawn as to whether Roberts’ negligence or Michael Izard’s own contributory negligence was the proximate cause of Izard’s injury. We disagree and affirm the order of the trial court.

In order to recover for negligence, plaintiff must establish (1) a legal duty, (2) a breach thereof, and (3) proximate cause of the injury. Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas Co., 269 N.C. 212, 152 S.E. 2d 336 (1967). In addition, North Carolina case law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Luna v. Needles Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Snellings v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Kiser v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Robertson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Bartlett v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Jenkins v. Lake Montonia Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Daniel v. City of MorgantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Payne v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API