Kiser v. Snyder
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendants contend the trial court erred in not granting their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of plaintiff’s case and renewed at the close of all the evidence. Defendants argue that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law on the issue of negligence and that the evidence indicated that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.
Counsel has not referred to any North Carolina case involving injury to a student precipitated by alleged teacher negligence in accidents associated with manual or vocational training classes. A teacher must abide…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Luna v. Needles Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sauers v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Payne v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Royal v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.