Legal Opinion

Kiser v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7421SC203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendants contend the trial court erred in not granting their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of plaintiff’s case and renewed at the close of all the evidence. Defendants argue that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law on the issue of negligence and that the evidence indicated that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

Counsel has not referred to any North Carolina case involving injury to a student precipitated by alleged teacher negligence in accidents associated with manual or vocational training classes. A teacher must abide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Luna v. Needles Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sauers v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Payne v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Royal v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API