Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Indiana Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 9, 2011No. 10-3214PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.
Autumn Eaton sued her employer, the Indiana Department of Corrections, Pendleton Juvenile Corrections Facility (“DOC”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, alleging that DOC discriminated against her on the basis of gender when it terminated her employment.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of DOC, and Eaton’s appeal followed. On appeal, Eaton argues that the district court erroneously granted summary judgment to DOC because Eaton presented sufficient evidence to create a material issue of disputed fact under the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of MineolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hedrick G. Humphries v. Cbocs West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Lola Ajayi v. Aramark Business Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Nancie Cloe v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Taylor v. Giant of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Marga Baker v. Macon Resources, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Paul Palmer, Jr. v. Indiana UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.