State ex rel. Bailey v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question presented in this appeal is whether the court of appeals erred by granting a writ of mandamus ordering the Industrial Commission to conduct a hearing on appellee’s application for an additional award for a specific safety requirement violation. On an appeal as a matter of right from a judgment of the court of appeals in an action for an extraordinary writ, we must review the judgment as if the action had been originally filed with this court. State, ex rel. Halloran, v. Zapatony (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 73, at fn. 2. The standard for review of an action in mandamus is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State ex rel. Halloran v. ZapatonyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Dillon v. Dayton Press, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Kirby v. S.G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Goldsby v. GerberOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State ex rel. Thompson Building Associates, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.