State ex rel. Thompson Building Associates, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant first urges that it was denied due process when the commission based its additional award upon the violation of provisions not cited by the employee. Appellant contends that the commission did not give it the required notice and thus the opportunity to argue these issues. Further, appellant maintains that there was no evidence to support the decision of the commission that the *201injury resulted from the failure of the employer to comply with a specific safety requirement. Thus, any additional award constituted an abuse of discretion.
In granting the employee an additional award of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Bailey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Dillon v. Dayton Press, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Kirby v. S.G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Smith v. HugueletOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bur. of WorkersÆ Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.