Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Halloran v. Zapatony

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1984No. 84-153PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

“In order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that the relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Westchester, v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42 [15 O.O.3d 53], paragraph one of the syllabus.

Under Section 83 of the Charter of the city of Dayton, “* * * the City Treasurer shall * * * disburse all public money * * * coming into his hands as City Treasurer, in pursuance of such regulations as may be prescribed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Wood v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Hospital v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In re Writ of Habeas Corpus for MalloryOhio Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API