Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1976No. 29PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant moved to quash the bill of indictment on the ground that G.S. 14-17 is unconstitutional. Denial of the motion constitutes his first assignment of error.

While the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is prosecuted may be challenged by a motion to quash, State v. Fredell, 283 N.C. 242, 195 S.E. 2d 300 (1973); State v. Atlas, 283 N.C. 165, 195 S.E. 2d 496 (1973), the motion in this case is merely an extension of the argument that the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment proscribed by the Eighth Amendment to the Federal Constitution.

Ar…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Jones v. KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API