Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1985No. 8520SC185PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant argues six questions. We have examined them carefully but have found no prejudicial error.

I

The State presented an assistant State medical examiner who examined Smith’s body. At the conclusion of the medical examiner’s testimony on direct examination, the prosecutor asked his opinion as to the cause of Smith’s death. Defendant entered a general objection, which was overruled, and is the basis for his first assignment of error.

We note initially that a general objection, if overruled, is ordinarily not effective on appeal. G.S. 8C-1, R. Ev. 103(a); 1 H. Brandis, N.C.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. WestallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API