Legal Opinion

People v. Webb

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 12, 2017No. A147740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPollak, J.

*489Defendant David Donald Webb appeals from a judgment convicting him of, among other things, driving a vehicle without consent, possession for sale of methamphetamine, and identity theft. He contends his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to move to dismiss the identity theft charge under the so-called Williamson1 rule. Defendant also contends that the court erred in imposing penalty assessments on fees imposed under the Health and Safety Code and in requiring him to pay $500 in attorney fees. We reject defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel but conclude…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. HighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. D.B. (In re D.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Martinez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API