Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 22, 2017No. G052640PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Leary, P.J.

*661Julio David Martinez III, was convicted of possessing and transporting a controlled substance. ( Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11378, *41911379.)1 In addition to three years of supervised probation, the trial court ordered Martinez to pay two mandatory fees-a $50 crime-lab fee (§ 11372.5) and a $150 drug program fee (§ 11372.7). The court concluded both these "fees" were actually "fines" subject to additional assessments, penalties, and a surcharge (collectively referred to as penalty assessments). ( People v. Sharret (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 859, 863, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 195 ( Sharret ) [lists examples…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. Partee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API