Legal Opinion
Miller v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1976No. 46702PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.
This is an original proceeding brought by claimant for the review of an order of the State Industrial Court en banc, which affirmed an order of the trial judge denying claimant an award under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
At the time of his injury, claimant was the assistant manager of a retail establishment for his employer, an own risk employer pursuant to 85 O.S.1971, Sec. 61(d). It is conceded that he was engaged in a nonhazardous employment, and for that reason no recital of the details of his accident and injury is necessary. For the same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Cities Service Gas Company v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lum v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Dominic v. Creek Nation, State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Atlas Rock Bit Service Co. v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- McFall v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Osmus v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.