Legal Opinion
Osmus v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 10, 1977No. 48639PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
Claimant, who is respondent here was employed by City of Oklahoma City, petitioner here, in the municipal court system as assistant court administrator. He had been employed for sixteen years and on the morning of May 10, 1974, he reported to work at the usual time. He was informed of a specially called meeting in the City Manager’s office that he should attend. Shortly before the appointed time for the meeting, the claimant walked from his office in one building of the Oklahoma City municipal complex to the City Manager’s office, a distance of approximately two and one half…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hayhurst v. HayhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Liebmann Arctic Ice Company v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Miller v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Stiles v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Cherokee Lines, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Burns v. Yuba Heat Transfer Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.