Legal Opinion
Cities Service Gas Company v. Witt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1972No. 45250PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice:
The question is whether or not the estoppel provisions of 85 O.S.1971, §§ 65.2 and 65.3 and Rule 24 of the State Industrial Court are applicable and binding upon an “own risk” employer where the employer has listed its office employees among those intended to be covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. We have previously answered this question in the negative, but because of new arguments we again consider the question.
Betty Louise Witt, claimant, while employed and working as a bookkeeper for her employer, Cities Service Gas Company, “own risk”, slipped and fell on a slick…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Hardy Sanitarium v. DehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Bryant-Hayward Drilling Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Rosamond Construction Company v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Zinke-Smith, Inc. v. FLA. INSURANCE GUAR. ASS'N, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.