Legal Opinion
Naso v. Ki Park
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1994No. 93 Civ. 0915 (WCC)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Michael Naso, Frank Naso, and Zeta Products, Inc. (“Zeta”) bring this action against defendants Ki Park, Célico International (“Célico”), Equity Leasing Corporation (“Equity”), Herbert Moelis, and Microfilm Products Company (“M.P.C.”) asserting claims based on violations of the federal patent laws, the federal antitrust laws, the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., in connection with the defendants’ manufacture and sale of certain…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wecosign, Inc. v. IFG Holdings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- B v. Optische Industrie De Oude Delft v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Black Radio Network, Inc. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Metrokane, Inc. v. the Wine EnthusiastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.