Legal Opinion

Shadford v. Ann Arbor Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by John H. Shadford against the Ann Arbor Street Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been here before, and is reported in 111 Mich. 390. A reference to that case will aid in understanding this .one, and will make it unnecessary to make so full a statement as would otherwise be *225necessary. Upon the second trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment, from which defendant has appealed.

As to the assignments of error in relation to the admission of evidence, we deem it unnecessary to say more than that we think the assignments are not well taken.

It is claimed by the defendant that the vise of which complaint is made was in general use by railway companies in the same or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Atlas Engine Works v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KeiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Lobenstein v. Whitehead & Kales Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lone Star Lignite Mining Co. v. CaddellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Dolstrom v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Middleton v. FaulknerMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API