Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Faulkner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1938No. 32969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellees at the time of the injury herein were engaged in cutting certain timber and converting same into cord-wood for shipment. Appellant, who sues by next friend, was a minor seventeen years of age, wholly without experience in such work, or in the use of the tool which caused the injury; and those facts appellees knew. Appellees employed appellant as a laborer, and among1 the tools furnished him was a wedge which was worn down and battered. As appellant started to work, a fellow employee suggested to him that the wedge was not suitable for use and that another should be obtained.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duerst v. St. Louis Stamping Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Allen Gravel Co. v. YarbroughMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mississippi Utilities Co. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bear Creek Mill Co. v. FountainMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wausau Southern Lumber Co. v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. MiddletonMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. FreeMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Letney v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API