Warder v. Bowen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Wabasha county, Start, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an action to recover $275, which plaintiffs claim that defendant agreed to pay them as boot between his mower and harvester and binder, and their mower and harvester and binder. The machines were respectively delivered by each party to the other. The defence is that plaintiffs warranted their harvester and binder in respect to lightness of draught; that the agreement was that defendant should take it upon trial, and, if it did not fulfil the warranty, plaintiffs should take it back; that be took it accordingly, and, find*336ing upon trial that it did not run as warranted, notified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawkins v. . PembertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Horton v. MaffittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Roberts v. Mazeppa Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Torkelson v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Siegel v. RieboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910