Horton v. Maffitt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was commenced in the District Court for Olmsted county, and was tried by the Court without a jury, who found for the plaintiffs. The defendants made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and they appeal from the order denying the same to this Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
GileillaN, Ch. J.
This is an action for partition. The Court found that plaintiff Horton owns an undivided 2-25, and defendant Maffett an undivided 23-25 of the premises; that defendant has paid all the taxes on such *291premises since they were owned by the parties, amounting to §108, and built a dwelling house thereon ; and directs judgment that the land, without the building, be sold, and the proceeds, after paying costs of sale and the disbursements in the' action,-be divided between the parties in accordance with their respective interests, and that defendant have sixty days…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warren v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Daniels v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Donnelly v. SimontonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Rutherford v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Minneapolis & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.