Legal Opinion

Torkelson v. Jorgenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Polk «county, Stearns, J., presiding, affirming a judgment of a justice court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This was an action before a justice of the peace, upon a promissory note. The defendant orally answered that the note was given in payment for a mower, bought by him of plaintiff; that, at the time defendant purchased the mower, plaintiff represented to him that it was a good and durable machine and would do good work; that these representations were false; that the mower was worthless and was incapable of doing the work it was intended to do, and unfit to use as a mower; that immediately after discovering that it was incapable of doing good work, defendant offered to return it to plain*384tiff,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warder v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Abilene Natlional Bank v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Guindon v. BruskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Segerstrom v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Siegel v. RieboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API