J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. McKinnon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for judgment in favor of plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Defendant was the local sales&gent for plaintiff’s threshing outfits at Crookston. At the close of the year’s agency he was indebted to plaintiff for extras and supplies, but asserted the right to offset on Ms settlement with Ms principal damages sustained by Mm for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of a traction engine which he claims to have purchased of Ms principal. At the *76trial defendant had a verdict on his counterclaim for $145. Upon a settled case plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, from which order the whole evidence is brought here on appeal.
We have carefully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Oster v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Tice v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Warder v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- American Graphic Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Mitchell v. PinckneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Teal v. Scandinavian-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.