Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Patrick GALLAGHER, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1996No. 96-30007PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Defendant David Patrick Gallagher was convicted of unauthorized use of an access device in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2) and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and sentenced to thirty-seven months incarceration. Defendant appeals both his conviction and the sentence imposed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In May 1995, defendant was awaiting sentencing on a conviction for the unauthorized use of an access device in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2) in the case United States v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Curtis Fitzgerald HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. MadridCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Theo Ervin Williams v. Robert Borg, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rodrigo Pino-NoriegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. William PenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.