Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtis Fitzgerald Harding

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1992No. 91-50423PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Curtis Fitzgerald Harding appeals his sentence of 120 months under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues that the distinction made in the United States Sentencing Guidelines between cocaine base (crack) and cocaine hydrochloride (powder cocaine) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The District Court had jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. This court has jurisdiction over the timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On February…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. SteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API