Legal Opinion
King v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 17, 1943PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The plaintiff King brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him by reason of the defendants’ negligence in the operation of a truck in their enginehouse at Cedar Hill in New Haven. He was a steam fitter in the employ of the Foskett & Bishop Company, an independent contractor engaged in replacing and reconstracting the entire heating and steam pressure system of the enginehouse. An award of compensation by his employer was made to the plaintiff and he brought this tort action against the defendants under General Statutes, § 5231. The insurance carrier for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Massolini v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.